Speaking of Hubble...

Speaking of Impact

November 11, 2009 by Mario Livio

blog_11_11_09The Greek physician Hippocrates of Cos (ca. 460 – 377 BCE), said once: “avoid all citations from the poets, for to quote from them argues feeble industry.” He did not have a similar opinion about citations of scientific results.

These days, the Hubble Space Telescope has passed yet another milestone. There have been more than 300,000 citations in scientific papers to results based on Hubble data. To be precise, on November 5, 2009, the number of citations was 301,373.

Think about this for a moment. This means that on average, every day since Hubble’s launch, there have been more than 40 citations to Hubble-based research!

One could hardly have expected a higher level of scientific impact. No wonder then, that when particle physicists expressed their ambitions for the Large Hadron Collider – the enormous particle accelerator near Geneva – they said that they “hope the machine will be a sort of Hubble Space Telescope of inner space.”

Irreplaceable

October 16, 2009 by Mario Livio

rdoxsey-smallI have always argued that no person is truly irreplaceable. I still believe that to be the case. However, my colleague and friend Rodger Doxsey came probably as close as anyone ever could to being irreplaceable. I know of no one who had a deeper and more thorough understanding of the workings of the Hubble Space Telescope than Rodger. Rodger passed away on October 13, 2009, at the age of 62.

Usually when we retire a computer, we make sure that all the information on it is stored elsewhere. Unfortunately we cannot do the same with the human brain.

For the past two decades, Rodger was driven by one passion – the desire to make the Hubble Space Telescope the most productive scientific instrument ever.

Here is a description by another Hubble pioneer, John Bahcall, of the birth of the “Hubble Space Telescope Snapshot Program,” a wonderful example of one of Rodger’s many brainchildren:

“The Snapshot program originated in a lunchtime conversation between Rodger Doxsey and myself in the STScI cafeteria sometime in the spring of 1989. We were both late to lunch and probably were the only people in the cafeteria. The principal topic of conversation was the expected low observing efficiency of the HST. Rodger described the extraordinary difficulty in making a schedule that would use a reasonable percentage of the available time for science observations. Slewing was slow and changing instruments or modes of observing was time-consuming. Also, the scheduling software that existed in 1989 was not very powerful.

I asked Rodger, without thinking very carefully about what I was saying, if it would be possible for the software he was developing to insert new objects in the holes in the schedule. I wondered aloud if one could improve the efficiency by choosing new objects, close to the directions of the scheduled targets, from a previously prepared list of interesting objects scattered over the sky. I remember that Rodger suddenly became very quiet, thought about the question, and finally replied something like: ‘In principle, it is possible.’ The Snapshot program was born at that lunch.”

Very few people know of a ritual Rodger and I have developed over the years. During the first servicing mission and subsequent observatory verification, Rodger and I followed all the tests for the instruments at the Institute. After the performance test of each instrument, we shook hands ceremoniously. This became somewhat of a superstition, and consequently, in all the following servicing missions we continued with the same ritual. During SM4, Rodger was already too weak to attend all the activities continuously. We did meet, however, after the completion of SM4, and performed the ritualistic handshake to celebrate all the instruments.

Goodbye friend. To me, you are irreplaceable.

Another milestone for Hubble

September 29, 2009 by Mario Livio
Stephan's Quintet, one of the first images from the renovated Hubble Space Telescope.

Stephan's Quintet, one of the first images from the renovated Hubble Space Telescope.

On September 10, 2009, in the evening, the Hubble Space Telescope obtained its 900,000th exposure since its launch in April 1990!

Not all, of course, were exposures of celestial objects (some were taken for calibration purposes), but still, think about it for a moment — Hubble has created an album of hundreds of thousands of images of the universe. I am reminded of the words of the American poet Jean Toomer, who wrote once:

Beyond plants are animals,

Beyond animals is man,

Beyond man is the universe.

Hubble has allowed us to actually see that cosmos which is beyond us, and has given us a chance to decipher the laws that govern its workings. With all the instruments on board Hubble now working, we can look forward to a period of great scientific productivity, and even more breathtaking images.

What a long, strange SMOV it’s been …

September 15, 2009 by Rachel Osten
Two of the new images taken by Hubble's Wide Field Camera 3, NGC 6302, popularly know as the "Butterfly Nebula" (top), and globular star cluster Omega Centauri (detail, bottom).

Two pictures from the upgraded Hubble Space Telescope: the Butterfly Nebula (top) and globular cluster Omega Centauri (detail, bottom).

Here at the Space Telescope Science Institute we are recovering from a whirlwind summer commissioning the new and repaired instruments on Hubble. Our public unveiling last Wednesday was a rocking success, judging from the reactions: the Internet was abuzz with comments, and tens of millions of you were hungry to see the images and get your hands on them. The network here at the Institute was considerably slower than normal on Wednesday and Thursday — not that we minded, as we all knew the reason why!

You might be thinking that we wizened astronomers are used to seeing such amazing images all the time, and are jaded by this awesome display of Hubble’s power. It’s not true, though. The auditorium here was packed with people eager to watch the press conference and see the results of our hard work, and almost everyone was seeing these results for the first time. I’m on the team that handles one of Hubble’s new instruments, the Cosmic Origins Spectrograph (COS), and even I hadn’t seen the results beforehand.  It was amazing to see the images of the butterfly nebula, and the dramatic reds and blues of the star cluster Omega Centauri.

The targets for these early release observations were chosen not just for the stunning presentations they make at press conferences, but for the legitimate science that can be done with the data. And so it was fitting that at our Friday morning coffee last week, only two days after the press release, we scientists were eager to discuss some of the first papers that had already been submitted on the science from Hubble’s new instruments.  These papers detailed discoveries of some of the youngest known galaxies, which would not have been visible without Hubble’s new instruments. Discovery of these young galaxies will now become routine, as the search turns to even younger galaxies.

The process of adjusting Hubble, called Servicing Mission Orbital Verification (SMOV) has not finished yet; some remaining calibration and confirmation data remains to be taken. The emphasis now is on routine operation of Hubble’s instruments for astronomers who have been waiting for their long-promised observations.

The tedious process of documenting all the activities that took place over the summer is also ongoing, but it’s nice to be able to reflect on the summer with a smile on my face and a few new images for my computer background, knowing that Hubble has a new lease on life and is going as strong — if not stronger — than ever.

Back to Cool

August 20, 2009 by Frank Summers

It’s the third week of August and already some of my friends on Facebook are talking about their kids going back to school. It struck me as weird because I don’t have my summer vacation until next week. My kids start school the following week. Seems those times of school starting after Labor Day (3 weeks away) are long gone.

Here at Space Telescope, August has been a month for getting back to work with Hubble. Servicing Mission Observatory Verification (SMOV) has been progressing all summer long with very good results. We even got a bonus: NICMOS is back to cool!

blog_08_20_09

The NICMOS Cryocooler System in the clean room.

NICMOS Anomaly
NICMOS is an instrument on Hubble whose acronym stands for Near Infrared Camera and Multi-Object Spectrograph. The important word here is “infrared.” Since infrared light is emitted by anything warm, infrared instruments like NICMOS must be cooled down to very low temperatures so that they can detect the emissions of astronomical objects and not their own hardware.

In September 2008, the NICMOS cooling system had to be shut down during a spacecraft computer update. Attempts to restart the cooling system after the update resulted in problems. In NASA-speak, these are called anomalies. The team made several attempts at restarting before work was discontinued in preparation for the October 2008 servicing mission.

As everyone knows, the October 2008 servicing mission was delayed until May 2009. During the winter, a few more attempts were made to restart NICMOS cooling, trying different solutions and encountering some different problems. In late January 2009, the restart attempts were deferred until after the servicing mission.

At this point, it has been almost a year since NICMOS was operational.

NICMOS Recovery
During Servicing Mission 4 in May 2009, NICMOS was not serviced. The problem was one for engineers, not astronauts, to solve. The SMOV plans for summer 2009 were chock full of tasks for both the two new instruments (WFC3 and COS) as well as the two repaired instruments (ACS and STIS). Still, it was important to get back to the work of recovering NICMOS as soon as feasible.

In late July, the first attempt at restart failed. New startup procedures were devised to work around the problems. It reminds me of the scenes in the movie “Apollo 13″ where Rusty Schweickart works through all sorts of variations of power startup in the ground simulator to find one that will work in space.

On August 1, the cooling system restarted and got past all the previous problems. NICMOS began cooling efficiently, and actually faster than expected. Note that when we say “cool,” we really mean “cold.” Really cold. Beyond Arctic, mind-numbing, freezingly cold. NICMOS is cooled to -321 degrees Fahrenheit. That’s the temperature needed for infrared observations.

It takes NICMOS more than a week to achieve that temperature. Then the instrument must show stability at those temperatures for science to be possible. After that comes a period of taking calibration data and determining how the instrument is functioning. Only then can science observations begin again.

Back to Business
We are not there yet, but we are past the major hurdle. It is a cause of many smiles in our building. Beyond that, SMOV is going well all around. Hubble looks to have five fully functional science instruments. The observatory will be the best it has ever been. And that, above all, is really cool.

Welcome!

July 31, 2009 by Mario Livio
Mario Livio (left) and Institute Director Matt Mountain (center) greet Servicing Mission 4 Commander Scott Altman.

Mario Livio (left) and Institute Director Matt Mountain (center) greet Servicing Mission 4 Commander Scott Altman.

The astronauts that performed the recent spectacular servicing on the Hubble Space Telescope, came to visit our workplace, the Space Telescope Science Institute, on July 21, 2009.

I have never seen the Institute’s staff so excited, nor have I ever seen our cafeteria so packed. Staff members brought their families, to share in the moment. The crew members were as wonderful as always: friendly, humorous, smart, and just so cool. Commander Scott “Scooter” Altman, with his usual generosity, told me: “You are the people who do the real work with this telescope, we are so grateful that you have allowed us to be a part of this.”

“Sure,” I replied, “but we don’t risk our lives for this work. We are the ones who are truly grateful.”
The presentations, the pictures, the autographs, the hand shakes, all passed almost too quickly. Einstein taught us that time is relative. When you are in good company, even six hours feel like five minutes.

And then it was time for them to leave. Megan McArthur and I hugged. I was thinking of something to say, and then she said: “Until next time.”

“Indeed,” I was happy to confirm. For some reason there were tears in my eyes.

On Science and Art

June 24, 2009 by Mario Livio

On Science and ArtLast week I was invited to give a talk in New York, as part of a series called “Geeking Out,” intended for a lay audience interested in science.

Somewhat to my surprise, the talk took place in an art gallery in
Brooklyn. Talks about science in an art gallery? Were we not told by popular psychologists that the artistic types rely more on the right side of the brain, while the mathematical geeks rely more on the left side?

Actually, serious neuroscience research shows this characterization to be way too simplistic — we all use both hemispheres of our brain. And the New York audience, who paid great attention to both the talks and the art on the walls, proved this to be absolutely true.

At some level, scientists and artists have a lot in common. They both use creativity to express the interaction between human perception and the universe. The scientists try to explain what they perceive, the artists attempt to convey it in a different form. Images taken by Hubble have blurred the distinction between science and art even further.

People react to Hubble images, which were taken for scientific purposes, with the same admiration usually reserved for artistic masterpieces. Indeed, Hubble images have been displayed in a major art museum, and one British journalist described Hubble images as “possibly the greatest art works of our time.” Science and art can, and perhaps even should, go hand in hand.

Coffee + Donuts + Morning Meetings = Checking out Hubble

June 17, 2009 by Rachel Osten

blog_06_17_09It’s been a couple of weeks since the astronauts safely landed after their repair mission to Hubble, and the public’s attention has turned to the current news of the day. But for a large number of people, the servicing mission is not done. In fact, it won’t really be over until the end of the summer.

We want to make sure that the instruments are working at their peak conditions before that point, so we are sure that the best science that can be done with Hubble is being done. The instruments on Hubble are complex and require careful check-out before they can be used for routine science operations. At times, the slow pace can be frustrating. It’s a series of baby steps, and after each step conditions are evaluated before going on to the next one. But this is all designed to catch anything out of the ordinary before it could become a problem that gets out of control.

Activities occur 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. Hubble doesn’t know about evenings and weekends, and so, during this phase, neither do the scientists and engineers working on the check-out activities.

One main feature of the summer activities is a daily morning meeting, where people working on all aspects of the telescope gather to give updates on the status of their piece of the Hubble pie — ranging from the power supply to the instruments, from scheduling to data archiving.

The meeting is early in the morning (for astronomer-types used to staying up late!) and is composed of NASA scientists and engineers  who can meet on-site, along with scientists on instrument teams phoning in from other places. Several of the instruments have had their first light from space, but don’t expect to see these on the Web anytime soon; they are only the first of many exposures of cosmic sources designed to test the inner workings of the instruments.

The acronyms fly fast and furious to describe the details of each instrument — the meeting would probably be twice as long if everything were spelled out! It’s a stretch to connect the flow charts and diagrams with the up-close images of Hubble taken when the astronauts had their hands on the telescope, but it is all the same telescope.

Hubble will soon be producing its amazing data better than ever, thanks to the efforts of everyone over this summer.

SMOVing Forward on Hubble

May 29, 2009 by Frank Summers
Wide Field Camera 3 in the Clean Room at Goddard Space Flight Center.

Wide Field Camera 3 in the Clean Room at Goddard Space Flight Center.

The May 2009 Servicing Mission 4 to the Hubble Space Telescope was a dramatic achievement. The astronaut spacewalks to replace, repair, and refresh the equipment on the observatory were as inspiring as they were successful. Every item on the to do list was checked off, and it is natural to ask “What’s next?”

In particular, folks want to know when the first images from the refurbished Hubble will be released.

The next step for the Hubble engineering team is called SMOV – Servicing Mission Observatory Verification. SMOV is the long process of starting up and checking out the new and repaired instruments.

Unfortunately for those impatient to see Hubble’s wonders once again, SMOV will last throughout the summer of 2009. Three of the reasons for the time required are outgassing, high-voltage, and calibration.

All materials have what chemistry calls “vapor pressure.” They release atoms and molecules, though generally in very small quantities compared to the density of Earth’s air. However, when those materials are taken to the vacuum of space, that vapor pressure becomes important.

Outgassing is the period during which the vapor pressure of the materials slowly decreases and adjusts to the space environment.

One reason outgassing is important is because the instruments use high-voltage power. Stray gases could conduct electricity and create a short. The high-voltage is slowly raised in increments and the response of the circuitry checked carefully at each stage.

Even when the instruments are operational, the calibration is painstaking. Every part of every detector must be tested and its response fully characterized. For science, it is extremely important to know how sensitive the instruments are and to be aware of the variations and anomalies in the recorded data. In short, we need to know what signals can be attributed to the instruments to figure out what signals come from the objects we observe throughout the universe.

Only when the instruments are fully operational will NASA be ready to unveil the early-release observations. I fully expect that these will be incredible new views of nebulae and galaxies, and can’t wait to see them.

But wait we must as SMOV runs its course. If things progress on schedule, the new images will be released in early September 2009.

The Magnificent Seven

May 24, 2009 by Mario Livio
The Hubble Space Telescope, after having been released from Space Shuttle Atlantis.

The Hubble Space Telescope, after having been released from Space Shuttle Atlantis.

“The Magnificent Seven” was a 1960 American western, about a group of gunmen that protect a Mexican village from bandits. The movie was an Americanized version of the film “The Seven Samurai,” by the legendary Japanese director Akira Kurosawa.

To me, the true magnificent seven are: Scott Altman, Greg Johnson, Megan McArthur, John Grunsfeld, Drew Feustel, Mike Massimino, and Mike Good — the crew of the Space Shuttle Atlantis that has just finished servicing the Hubble Space Telescope.

Now that the Atlantis has landed safely, we can say without reservation that this has been the most amazing servicing mission to this unique telescope.

It is relatively easy to succeed when everything is going according to plan. This crew was like excellent tea — you don’t know how strong it is until you put it into boiling water! These astronauts overcame every unexpected difficulty, and they succeeded in making Hubble the best it has ever been.

In the movie “The Magnificent Seven,” one of the gunmen expresses his admiration for a shot taken by one of his friends, exclaiming: “Ah, that was the greatest shot I’ve ever seen.”

I strongly believe that Hubble’s greatest shot of the universe is still to come. And it will come because of the work of the magnificent seven.